Sunday, 19 July 2026

Because things suck for a lot of people.

A lot of people have a sentiment not just of stagnation, but that things are actually going downhill, getting worse over time.

Despite technology having improved, it now takes 30 years to afford a house. 
In a digital age where it’s easier to share information than ever, education comes with gigantic student debts and leads to unpaid internships and an unstable job market. 
The social media that was supposed to connect people has left everyone more lonely and disconnected than ever. 
Healthcare costs are through the roof, and at the same time most people’s health is in a miserable state. 
Obesity, being able to afford a caffeine addiction, cheap telescreens to spy on our every movement while trying to turn us into phone zombies, and the mountains of microplastics that are accumulating as a result of massive amounts of cheap consumerist crap, are declared to be the signs that life is awesome, and that everything is going great. 
We are constantly told that the economy is growing, that we are all getting wealthy beyond belief, that everything is getting more and more amazing by the minute.

But people don’t feel so great, life feels like a black mirror episode.


So this leave 2 options:

Option one, is to admit that the system isn’t working well. 
That it is in fact producing boatloads of cheap consumerist crap, making lines go up, creating people who can afford private epstein islands and volcano lairs, that it is in fact increasing the production of debt, of bombs, and of addictions, and that this is actually not a good thing.

The other option, is to find a scapegoat, and blame them
Declare that everything is their fault, that they are the reason why people are not happy even as more gambling apps are being developed.

The first option would mean changing things, and less power for the people who rule over us. 
So the second one, which preserves the status quo and allows things to continue going down the same path, following the same trend, is the one that is chose by the media, the politicians, and the ruling elites.


Differing scapegoats are being targeted and blamed for everything that is wrong with modern society. 
Trans people are different, a minority, and most people don’t really have much knowledge or any personal experience with someone trans, so that makes them OK-ish scapegoats. 
But at the end of the day, even very bigoted people have trouble explaining how harassing trans people is supposed to make their lives any better.

But if the whole issue is not a tiny fraction of the population using the wrong bathroom, and it’s not the system itself, and it’s not the billionaires at the top, then who is left?

Competing workers, that’s who.

Within the logic of capitalism, where there are no unions, there is no class consciousness, no cooperation, no helping each other, and making life better for each other… 
Well other workers are seen as people who compete for jobs and drive wages down. 
People who compete to buy things like groceries, gas and housing, and drive prices up.

So that’s why we see the two main scapegoats being DEI and migrants.

In case it was not clear for some people, DEI outrage is even more about the idea of people “stealing jobs” than the whole migrant thing.


As most jobs continue being mechanized and the hope is to have LLMs do most of the other jobs, there are going to be more and more workers left unemployed and wondering “who the hell took my job?!?”, so I would expect more scapegoating of things like DEI and immigration by the ruling overlords.

Here are the next steps to keep going in that fascist direction:

  • DEI hatred becomes open white supremacy
  • Nationalism and hatred of immigrants turns into ultranationalism, and other nations being seen as competitors to be taken out
  • It’s declared that women need to stop stealing jobs too, and instead be forced into birthing rape babies in order to serve national interests
  • Continued market economy, but with closed borders to migrants and tariffs on foreign goods or import bans, trending towards ideas of autarky
  • Looking at places like Greenland and Venezuela as potential options for more Lebensraum
  • More cult of hard work and poor people being accused of being lazy, slogans like “Arbeit macht frei” making a comeback
  • More deportations, more detention camps, more mass incarceration, more convict labor and exploitation, more surveillance to look for any potential anti-regime activity, more violent repression, militarized police, brutally killing people in the streets, more endless wars, more death penalties

The lines between the individual and the community are already being redrawn.

Wealthy people are no longer really seen as just individuals. They have accumulated too much power already. 
They are now seen as the job creators, the investors and entrepreneurs who decide the future, and the people who pay to fund the police and the prisons. 
Wealthy people have merged with the economy and the nation in people’s minds. 
It’s very common to hear that since tax cuts and subsidies and wars are good for the wealthy, it’s going to be good for the economy, and good for the nation.


The trend towards fascism is kind of an inevitable result of capitalism over time.

Take something like healthcare. 
The humane thing to do, would be to treat people like human beings, and provide healthcare to people who need it, based on a medical diagnosis.

When instead you want to have something inhumane, that prioritizes the profits of wealthy people over human lives and human health, when you want a system where hospitals are dumping patients in the streets, where people have to ration insulin, and where getting sick will bankrupt people even though they are paying through the nose for insurance every month…

Well, you have to develop a pretty vile, cruel, inhumane ideology in order to support it.

In the capitalist ideology, the other human beings who need healthcare stop being seen as humans in need of help, and instead are seen as competitors. 
Thus the whole “I don’t want to pay for a competitor’s healthcare!” thing.

Since the capitalist ideology can’t blame capitalism itself, or the pharmaceutical companies, or the health insurance companies and so on for the high price of healthcare, the other people also trying to access healthcare are scapegoated. They are declared to be the ones at fault for such high prices, and the idea becomes that if were just left to die, then prices would drop and it would be cheaper.

And then once the capitalists promote the Malthusian laissez-faire potato famine ideas that cutting all welfare and letting competitors die would probably improve things, that moves the overton window enough for the fascists to show up with ideas on how to take out competitors more efficiently.

If evicting people from a house is normal in order to make space for someone else who is said to deserve it more… Then why not evict people from the country to free up a job, or why not evict people from Greenland to have more space? 
Once the surveillance and the brutal police repression, and the constant wars and giant military has been normalized, well why not have another war for the good of the nation? Just a short one, not an endless one, just a tiny little blitzkrieg!

Thus proceeds the slow descent from capitalism into fascism.


It’s not really possible to keep a capitalist system with a giant military industrial complex that generates private profits and lobbies for more war without trending that way. 
It’s not possible to keep a capitalist healthcare system where profits are put above saving human lives, without normalizing deaths for profit.
It’s not possible to normalize a housing system based around homelessness, evictions, and ever increasing rents for private profits, without moving the overton window towards deportations.

You can’t have an ideology of “money makes right” without people slowly realizing that it means “might makes right”.

Everything that would involve treating people more humanely, with less cruelty, would mean less power for the elites. So it’s always declared to be incompatible with capitalism and free markets, bad for wealthy people and thus for the economy.

Wealth inequality grows, the wealthy own almost everything, and everyone else is already under a giant pile of debt. So to keep growing the profits of the wealthy who already own everything, capitalism has to morph into fascism.

The only other option is to go in the other direction, removing the profit motive from wars, removing the profit motive from mass incarceration, removing the profit motive from housing, removing the profit motive from healthcare, etc.

In a capitalist system where a neighbor is not treated with love or kindness or even basic human decency, but is instead left to die so others can have more… Well that kind of heartless, callous attitude, where deaths for profits are normalized, leads to fascism.


I don’t know how to get people out of that shitty horrible mindset of considering fellow workers as “stealing” from them, seeing them as competitors and aliens instead of fellow human beings who are also working to try and improve their lives.

I’m not sure how to get people to notice that the border fences and the extra deportations have not actually improved their lives in any way, that housing and grocery prices are still going up, and wages still stagnating or even going down as things switch to a gig economy.

I try to explain it to people, but most do not seem to grasp that deporting the workers who build homes is unlikely to reduce the price of housing, and that the people who own all of the real estate and are filling their pockets with passive incomes are the ones to look at.

Many look at the trillionaires doing nazi salutes with adoration in their eyes, many talk about wars as a good thing, request more prisons, more people behind bars to be tough on, and homeless people being bulldozed away, treated like things. 
It seems incredibly hard to get through to the “I’m not paying for a competitor’s healthcare” crowd and get them to notice that any insurance scheme already does that, and that a couple of billionaires having the best healthcare in the world doesn’t actually help THEM and their family. 
Many even seem reluctant to imagine people having even the most basic human rights.

Many don’t even really seem to care about whether their own lives are improved at all in any way, as long as they can take out their rage on someone else by using state violence as an intermediary.

Appealing to a better nature does not work, and appealing to self interest also does not work, because many people are too angry to think.

People would need to calm down in some way first. If they were less angry, I’m convinced that many of them could be reasoned with. 
But I don’t really know how we could deal with this mass anger we are seeing. 
Perhaps widespread campaigns to offer free hugs should be on the menu? Should people be encouraged to try and share more funny cat videos again? I’m open to any ideas.

Sunday, 12 July 2026

Can humans solve poverty?

Most proposed solutions to poverty, such as higher minimum wages, or universal basic income, or everyone working harder to pull themselves up by the bootstraps, simply cannot work.

This is because prices for something like housing or rent do not depend on how much it cost to build the house, but instead depend on how much money the people who need housing have access to.

When people have access to lots of money because of 30 year mortgages… Well then prices end up very high. 
If families have 2 incomes? Prices rise.

This is something that was already analyzed in detail centuries ago by Adam Smith, who noted that handouts of kelp only led to increased rents, that the wealthy owner would gladly reap what he did not sow, enrich himself, and keep everyone living paycheck to paycheck.

It was noted by Marx, and by Henry George (the guy behind Georgism), and by many others. 
It’s really easy to notice for anyone who actually cares to look.


Thing is, making a fortune in real estate and getting insane amounts of passive income from rent, is very profitable and very convenient for wealthy people.

Even if it causes poverty, and forces others to work a lot to own very little.


We can solve poverty, but that would mean taking away rent seeking, taking away the passive incomes of the very wealthy.

And they don’t want that.

But as long as we don’t deal with that, we can’t change much. 
It’s a bit like trying to improve the living conditions of a slave: If he still has an owner, then if you give the slave extra food, the owner can just cut back on the amount that 
he gives to the slave, and in the end nothing changed.

We can end poverty, but to do so would require ending the power discrepancy, the legalized rent seeking, the ability to derive a passive income by threatening others with evictions. 
Otherwise any money or benefits given to the poor are immediately siphoned up by the rich.

And it’s not just like this with housing: 
Take something like insulin prices in the US, and you get the same issue. You could give people a million dollar subsidy to buy insulin, and soon the price of insulin would be over a million per vial.

It’s not some magical thing, again, a corporation with a monopoly on a life saving drug raking in giant profits is absolutely expected, everyone who looks at these things knows that this is how it happens.

But… the owners of the pharmaceutical companies like to get dividends and passive incomes, and wealth growth. 
If you want to solve the eternal poverty of the people who pay $500 a month for insulin, you’d have to take away the government granted monopoly and rent seeking rights and passive income of the pharmaceutical company.

Otherwise, the result is very predictable: The prices are raised, until people are left living paycheck to paycheck, and struggling to afford even that.


We’ve had insane gains in productivity, production was automated robotized, mechanized, industrialized. 
But people still struggle to make ends meet in any system where rent seeking is allowed, no matter how productive they become.

That’s because even a medieval peasant was already able to produce more than enough to feed and house and clothe himself. 
The reason that medieval peasants struggled was that they had to fund castles and cathedrals and palaces for the lords and the nobles.

If we keep that system, then even if we produce more, even if we work more, even if we have more money… 
Prices will be increased, the wealthy will siphon up all the improvements, and then build themselves palaces or do space tourism.

Saturday, 11 July 2026

In theory, we should be able to agree on a lot of things.

Take something like insulin. 

If you give a for-profit corporation a monopoly on a life saving drug, they will jack up the prices to maximize their profits. 
This is very basic market theory, that every capitalist can understand. 
Every capitalist has also learned to repeat that monopolies are bad, and that competition is good.

So, we should be able to agree to get rid of government granted monopolies over drugs, right?

Lol, nope! 
Suddenly, the capitalists don’t want capitalism. 
Suddenly, they hate the idea of competition, of opening up the market, of removing the rules that keep out competitors.


The sad reality is that while capitalists hide behind ideas of free markets, they only do it when it suits them. 
They want “free markets” when it fucks over the little people, not all the time.

They don’t mind pharmaceutical companies getting super wealthy off creating an opioid crisis. 
For that kind of stuff, they want deregulation, government staying out of things, letting the pharmaceutical companies enrich themselves with no rules and no intervention.

But when the free market ideas would hurt the big corporations, and help poor people?
When it comes time to fight against government granted monopolies on insulin, on one click buying, or on rectangles with rounded corners? 
POOF! 
Not a capitalist left in sight.

It’s like when it comes to discussing migrants who want to move to get a better job. 
All the free market people who want big government to stay out of people’s lives? Who chant that people who give up freedom for security shall have neither? 
Gone! 
Nowhere to be found.

Or with all of the “you will own nothing and be happy” stuff, where nobody owns anything anymore, corporations remotely control the stuff that you bought, can take away your media and disable it, can discontinue services and remotely deactivate stuff people bought, or enforce artificial restrictions on a printer so it won’t accept ink from a competitor and all that? 
Nope, when it comes to right to repair, when it comes to the holy sanctity of private property, and actually being able to do what you want with the stuff that you bought… 
No more capitalists to be found! 
Instead they want government to persecute people for hacking and jailbreaking 
their own devices, that they bought.

Being tough on crime, upholding the law, enforcing contracts? 
When it suits the wealthy, capitalists LOVE that shit. 
But for the little people? Nah. Poor people have to agree to private arbitration to exist, so they get whatever the corporations decide, and have no rights to class action lawsuits or things like that.


That’s why it’s so hard to ever agree on anything: Most capitalists just don’t want things that would reduce the power of the oligarchs, and help the little people, the average Joe.

They bring up ideas of free markets, of competition, of deregulation, only for as long as those benefit the wealthy, and discard those very same ideas immediately when they could be used to benefit the average person.

They want to socialize the costs and privatize the profits, and to kneel before billionaire oligarchs. 
They don’t seem to have any other principles than just doing whatever benefits the ruling oligarchs at any time.

Hell, even something as simple as endless wars: 
It should be super EASY for capitalists to say “uh, I don’t want my taxes to fund other people’s death”, “government should get out of people’s lives, government is not the answer, it is the problem!”, or “who’s gonna pay for it”, or “we should be more fiscally responsible, we cannot afford it!”, or some other capitalist slogan along those lines. 
They could be arguing that there is probably lots of fraud, that lots of the people who receive missiles don’t deserve any, that they should just pull harder on their bootstraps and buy their own missiles if they want some. 
But nah. 
When it comes to filling the pockets of the military industrial complex, to wasting taxpayer money, and to sending average people to the meatgrinder, suddenly, there isn’t a single one of those anti-big-government free market advocates anywhere.

They are only here when it comes to protecting the interests of the wealthy.

Some poor person is getting screwed? Capitalists chant “life’s unfair, deal with it”.

But if some wealthy person needs to pay taxes? Never a single capitalist around to scream “life’s unfair, deal with it!” at them when they complain.


Really, the modern capitalist should just be called an oligarchist. 
Apparently all they want is a powerful ruling class that they can kneel before and worship like fanboys.

Friday, 10 July 2026

Healthcare ?

The issue is that what is best for public health, and what is most profitable, are often completely at odds with each other.

And then since almost our entire society is oriented around maximizing profits, with absolutely no regards for the negative impacts on public health…

Almost everyone ends up stressed out, tried, trying to manage chronic issues, anxiety, burnout, depression, addictions, obesity, and so on.

When the profit motives get involved, and doctors are in it for the money, and drug lobbyists are in it for the money, and pharmaceutical companies are run to maximize the profits of a few, and not the health of the many… 
Well then you end up with doctors overprescribing opioids, and enriching the Purdue family while a public health crisis is made even worse.

And it’s not just medicine that ends up sick and twisted in that way by the profit motive. 
The transportation industry pushes for a car centric society and not walkable cities and bike lanes. 
Pollution overall is quite profitable, plastic is cheap and competitive, so almost every company sells plastic stuff, and the public health issues with microplastic pollution being everywhere, including our blood, are kind of brushed aside.


Food is kind of important if you want to stay in good health. 
Fresh fruit and vegetables are good for your health, we know that.

But also, perishable fresh fruit are a nightmare for the food industry. It’s not just much harder to store fresh produce, and to deal with logistics, when you switch over to processed junk food, it’s also less satiating so you can sell more, people are willing to pay more, it’s more addictive, it makes more people come back, it’s less work, you can piggyback off the ads from the junk food companies and display their logos to lure people in, and so on.

Making a restaurant that sells some kind of fresh fruit and vegetables based stuff is overall very low profits. Replace the veggies with something like fries from the freezer and oil and salt that store a long time, and you can increase profits. Replace the fruit with sugary artificial fruit flavored ice cream from a big brand, advertise it with one of their signs, and you can increase profits. 
Push people to drink a cocktail, some alcohol, or a soda, instead of tap water, and again, profits increase while public health outcomes decrease. 
After the salty junk food, you can offer a dose of caffeine, and push people to eat a big dose of sugar, and again, that’s where the profits come from.

You could start off in the restaurant industry, full of hopes and dreams, imagining that you’ll make people slightly less sick than the rest of the junk food places. But when every other place is using all the tricks they can to maximize profits, and rents and costs are increasing, and many customers are more attracted by junk food than by veggies… Well, either you end up kicked out of the industry by market forces, or you end up broken, having to make concession after concession, inevitably driven towards being a provider of addictions, considering whether adding a tobacco machine might help drive traffic, wondering if you are allowed to install a one armed bandit, or sell some kind of gambling addiction or something, just trying to find some way to make ends meet.

When adding extra sugar and salt to everything increases revenue by a lot, then in a profit-maximizing economy, if you want to be part of the food industry, you end up forced to do it.

When there is a guy selling drugs, and another selling salad, the guy who is selling addictions can increase prices much more, and get repeat customers much more easily than the one selling salads. There is more money to be made cooking meth or making coffee and serving alcohol, than you can make from cooking a healthy vegetable soup.


What is the education budget spent on teaching people healthy eating habits, vs the budget spent on ads and marketing for junk food that makes people sick?

One is much less profitable than the other.

How is your job organized? 
It’s probably a for-profit corporation. 
So your breaks are kept to a minimum regardless of the impacts on your health, you might have to pee in bottles, or go through “crunch time”, and both your mental and physical health are likely going to be sacrificed at every opportunity in order to maximize profits. You’ll be treated as a human resources, to be strained to the maximum, and then discarded if broken. Schedules and deadlines will be set without regard to how much stress it causes you, just based on what is presumed to maximize profits. You might get something like free access to caffeine in order to boost your productivity, and you might get stuff like emails or phone calls during your free time, weekends, and holidays. 
Sometimes some efforts might be made to keep some people from burning out too quickly, but it’s a purely profit based thing, based on how much it would cost to train a replacement or automate the job. If a pizza party here and there helps cut down on turnover costs a bit, it can happen. 
But overall, straining people, and then discarding them and trying to replace them with someone fresh, young and dynamic if they ever stumble and can’t keep up, is just the normal way of doing business, of maximizing profits.


High inequality and poverty leads to more health issues, diseases, addictions, lower life expectancy and so on. 
It’s very well studied, if instead of ensuring that everyone can have a decent standard of living, you give all the money to a couple of wealthy people, and have everyone else live in poverty, public health declines.

But it’s also just the way that the profit motive distorts every industry.

Sports is supposed to be good for your health. Moving a bit, doing soe exercise, great idea, no?

But then you add in the profit motive… 
And then instead of sports being a kind of physical exercise that you do in order to remain healthy, it morphs into something that you watch on TV while sitting on a couch and consuming junk food, a way to sell you merch, and get you to drink more beer, something to gamble on, something that warps the entire college and education system, something where even the athletes who manage to resist doping themselves too much end up strained so hard that it becomes unhealthy.

And once broken, they too are discarded, and replaced by young and dynamic fresh blood.

When sports isn’t just something you consume on TV, but participate in, that’s the ideal that is sold: Sacrificing your health trying to make some millions, before being discarded once you break. 
Getting famous so you can turn around and push some products onto people who watch you.

Some old guy who is doing regular exercise via sports, and keeping in good physical shape until late in life? It’s not what maximizes profits.

When some exercise is done, then with the for-profit motive, that too becomes distorted.
There isn’t really much money to be made in telling someone that they can exercise topless, but selling them some fancy specialized sportswear, and all sorts of weird gadgets and machines and shakes and supplements and powders and so on, subscriptions to treadmills, that is more profitable than a walk in the park.

Instead of getting bike lanes, you end up taking the car to go pay a subscription to use an indoor bike, and a bunch of people trying to convince you that it will all be for nothing if you drink a glass of water without any added supplements.

It’s a whole for-profit industry, it’s not for public health.


You as an individual, when you make choices, maximizing your long term health outcomes, or minimizing your short term costs, are going to be at odds with each other almost all of the time.

For any company that has employees and customers, same thing, public health and short term gains in the next quarterly report are at odds.

For any government too, investing in infrastructure that improves long term mental and physical health outcomes is directly at odds with doing austerity politics, and/or trying to maximize tax revenue.

If people take the bike lane to the public park, and then do some exercise there… It means you pay basically nothing for that trip. There isn’t really any profit being made, or much money changing hands, buying the bike would be the biggest investment, but it’s not much.

But then some of the people drilling for oil are not needed anymore, profits drop there, the gas station is less profitable if you use the bike, the fitness industry is not getting a subscription from you, no tax is being paid there either, no profits, no employment. 
You can drink some water from a public fountain at the park, and again, if you are not drinking some soda, or gigantic coffee, or some exercise drink, or energy drink, or something like that, it’s entire industries that vanish, tax revenue that crumbles away as the addictions to sugar disappear.

If you are less sick and obese, then that’s again at odds with the healthcare industry, and the profits of the pharmaceutical companies.

If you are privileged enough to be in a place where you can still buy seasonal fruits and vegetables from some local market, and you do that, well that’s horrible for the junk food industry, and the fast food places, and the supermarkets and other retailers, and the shipping industry, and the factories who manufacture the high fructose treats, and so on.

Every addiction that you abandon is an industry that suffers, and a lost opportunity to profit.


Today, society is sick, and we, the people in it, are sick too.

Because the whole thing and almost all of our behaviors are oriented for selfish monetary profits, and not maximizing public health, meaning our own health.

Maximizing profits means that people always trend towards scams, selling addictions, subscriptions, ineffective band-aid solutions, and even creating problems, manufacturing needs, insecurities and so on.

We sell addictions and junk food and debt to each other, we all end up poor and sick, with only a couple of people sitting on big piles of money.

But if anyone suggests changing anything… Well, it threatens our jobs, our income sources! 
It threatens our lifestyles as isolated fattening people who are collecting addictions and subscriptions and chronic health issues of all kind. 
It threatens profits, passive incomes, tax revenue and power for politicians, it threatens the financial system, and the profits of every industry. 
It threatens the status quo.

Most people just don’t really want to envision a world where we do anything else than selling each other addictions, and creating problems so we can sell solutions and subscriptions, and where people are not constantly threatened by violence and expulsions and foreclosures and getting fired, and strained and pushed 40+ hours per week.

Everyone trumpets around about the value of “hard work”, as if having some time off and spending it with friends and family and taking care of your health was some kind of a crime, people are accused of the sin of laziness if they suggest we could all work less and be better off.

You must work hard to create addictions and sell junk, so that you can then afford to buy your own health problems, consuming as much stuff as possible, until it makes you sick, and leaves you broke, and/or broken.

It’s declared to be the one and only way of life, the very best use and distribution of resources, and making us all very wealthy.

Because things suck for a lot of people.

A lot of people have a sentiment not just of stagnation, but that things are actually going downhill, getting worse over time. Despite techn...