Saturday, 11 July 2026

In theory, we should be able to agree on a lot of things.

Take something like insulin. 

If you give a for-profit corporation a monopoly on a life saving drug, they will jack up the prices to maximize their profits. 
This is very basic market theory, that every capitalist can understand. 
Every capitalist has also learned to repeat that monopolies are bad, and that competition is good.

So, we should be able to agree to get rid of government granted monopolies over drugs, right?

Lol, nope! 
Suddenly, the capitalists don’t want capitalism. 
Suddenly, they hate the idea of competition, of opening up the market, of removing the rules that keep out competitors.


The sad reality is that while capitalists hide behind ideas of free markets, they only do it when it suits them. 
They want “free markets” when it fucks over the little people, not all the time.

They don’t mind pharmaceutical companies getting super wealthy off creating an opioid crisis. 
For that kind of stuff, they want deregulation, government staying out of things, letting the pharmaceutical companies enrich themselves with no rules and no intervention.

But when the free market ideas would hurt the big corporations, and help poor people?
When it comes time to fight against government granted monopolies on insulin, on one click buying, or on rectangles with rounded corners? 
POOF! 
Not a capitalist left in sight.

It’s like when it comes to discussing migrants who want to move to get a better job. 
All the free market people who want big government to stay out of people’s lives? Who chant that people who give up freedom for security shall have neither? 
Gone! 
Nowhere to be found.

Or with all of the “you will own nothing and be happy” stuff, where nobody owns anything anymore, corporations remotely control the stuff that you bought, can take away your media and disable it, can discontinue services and remotely deactivate stuff people bought, or enforce artificial restrictions on a printer so it won’t accept ink from a competitor and all that? 
Nope, when it comes to right to repair, when it comes to the holy sanctity of private property, and actually being able to do what you want with the stuff that you bought… 
No more capitalists to be found! 
Instead they want government to persecute people for hacking and jailbreaking
their own devices, that they bought.

Being tough on crime, upholding the law, enforcing contracts? 
When it suits the wealthy, capitalists LOVE that shit. 
But for the little people? Nah. Poor people have to agree to private arbitration to exist, so they get whatever the corporations decide, and have no rights to class action lawsuits or things like that.


That’s why it’s so hard to ever agree on anything: Most capitalists just don’t want things that would reduce the power of the oligarchs, and help the little people, the average Joe.

They bring up ideas of free markets, of competition, of deregulation, only for as long as those benefit the wealthy, and discard those very same ideas immediately when they could be used to benefit the average person.

They want to socialize the costs and privatize the profits, and to kneel before billionaire oligarchs. 
They don’t seem to have any other principles than just doing whatever benefits the ruling oligarchs at any time.

Hell, even something as simple as endless wars: 
It should be super EASY for capitalists to say “uh, I don’t want my taxes to fund other people’s death”, “government should get out of people’s lives, government is not the answer, it is the problem!”, or “who’s gonna pay for it”, or “we should be more fiscally responsible, we cannot afford it!”, or some other capitalist slogan along those lines. 
They could be arguing that there is probably lots of fraud, that lots of the people who receive missiles don’t deserve any, that they should just pull harder on their bootstraps and buy their own missiles if they want some. 
But nah. 
When it comes to filling the pockets of the military industrial complex, to wasting taxpayer money, and to sending average people to the meatgrinder, suddenly, there isn’t a single one of those anti-big-government free market advocates anywhere.

They are only here when it comes to protecting the interests of the wealthy.

Some poor person is getting screwed? Capitalists chant “life’s unfair, deal with it”.

But if some wealthy person needs to pay taxes? Never a single capitalist around to scream “life’s unfair, deal with it!” at them when they complain.


Really, the modern capitalist should just be called an oligarchist. 
They are almost indistinguishable from the right wing royalists that came before.
Apparently all they want is a powerful ruling class that they can kneel before and worship like fanboys.

Friday, 10 July 2026

Healthcare ?

The issue is that what is best for public health, and what is most profitable, are often completely at odds with each other.

And then since almost our entire society is oriented around maximizing profits, with absolutely no regards for the negative impacts on public health…

Almost everyone ends up stressed out, tried, trying to manage chronic issues, anxiety, burnout, depression, addictions, obesity, and so on.

When the profit motives get involved, and doctors are in it for the money, and drug lobbyists are in it for the money, and pharmaceutical companies are run to maximize the profits of a few, and not the health of the many… 
Well then you end up with doctors overprescribing opioids, and enriching the Purdue family while a public health crisis is made even worse.

And it’s not just medicine that ends up sick and twisted in that way by the profit motive. 
The transportation industry pushes for a car centric society and not walkable cities and bike lanes. 
Pollution overall is quite profitable, plastic is cheap and competitive, so almost every company sells plastic stuff, and the public health issues with microplastic pollution being everywhere, including our blood, are kind of brushed aside.


Food is kind of important if you want to stay in good health. 
Fresh fruit and vegetables are good for your health, we know that.

But also, perishable fresh fruit are a nightmare for the food industry. It’s not just much harder to store fresh produce, and to deal with logistics, when you switch over to processed junk food, it’s also less satiating so you can sell more, people are willing to pay more, it’s more addictive, it makes more people come back, it’s less work, you can piggyback off the ads from the junk food companies and display their logos to lure people in, and so on.

Making a restaurant that sells some kind of fresh fruit and vegetables based stuff is overall very low profits. Replace the veggies with something like fries from the freezer and oil and salt that store a long time, and you can increase profits. Replace the fruit with sugary artificial fruit flavored ice cream from a big brand, advertise it with one of their signs, and you can increase profits. 
Push people to drink a cocktail, some alcohol, or a soda, instead of tap water, and again, profits increase while public health outcomes decrease. 
After the salty junk food, you can offer a dose of caffeine, and push people to eat a big dose of sugar, and again, that’s where the profits come from.

You could start off in the restaurant industry, full of hopes and dreams, imagining that you’ll make people slightly less sick than the rest of the junk food places. But when every other place is using all the tricks they can to maximize profits, and rents and costs are increasing, and many customers are more attracted by junk food than by veggies… Well, either you end up kicked out of the industry by market forces, or you end up broken, having to make concession after concession, inevitably driven towards being a provider of addictions, considering whether adding a tobacco machine might help drive traffic, wondering if you are allowed to install a one armed bandit, or sell some kind of gambling addiction or something, just trying to find some way to make ends meet.

When adding extra sugar and salt to everything increases revenue by a lot, then in a profit-maximizing economy, if you want to be part of the food industry, you end up forced to do it.

When there is a guy selling drugs, and another selling salad, the guy who is selling addictions can increase prices much more, and get repeat customers much more easily than the one selling salads. There is more money to be made cooking meth or making coffee and serving alcohol, than you can make from cooking a healthy vegetable soup.


What is the education budget spent on teaching people healthy eating habits, vs the budget spent on ads and marketing for junk food that makes people sick?

One is much less profitable than the other.

How is your job organized? 
It’s probably a for-profit corporation. 
So your breaks are kept to a minimum regardless of the impacts on your health, you might have to pee in bottles, or go through “crunch time”, and both your mental and physical health are likely going to be sacrificed at every opportunity in order to maximize profits. You’ll be treated as a human resources, to be strained to the maximum, and then discarded if broken. Schedules and deadlines will be set without regard to how much stress it causes you, just based on what is presumed to maximize profits. You might get something like free access to caffeine in order to boost your productivity, and you might get stuff like emails or phone calls during your free time, weekends, and holidays. 
Sometimes some efforts might be made to keep some people from burning out too quickly, but it’s a purely profit based thing, based on how much it would cost to train a replacement or automate the job. If a pizza party here and there helps cut down on turnover costs a bit, it can happen. 
But overall, straining people, and then discarding them and trying to replace them with someone fresh, young and dynamic if they ever stumble and can’t keep up, is just the normal way of doing business, of maximizing profits.


High inequality and poverty leads to more health issues, diseases, addictions, lower life expectancy and so on. 
It’s very well studied, if instead of ensuring that everyone can have a decent standard of living, you give all the money to a couple of wealthy people, and have everyone else live in poverty, public health declines.

But it’s also just the way that the profit motive distorts every industry.

Sports is supposed to be good for your health. Moving a bit, doing soe exercise, great idea, no?

But then you add in the profit motive… 
And then instead of sports being a kind of physical exercise that you do in order to remain healthy, it morphs into something that you watch on TV while sitting on a couch and consuming junk food, a way to sell you merch, and get you to drink more beer, something to gamble on, something that warps the entire college and education system, something where even the athletes who manage to resist doping themselves too much end up strained so hard that it becomes unhealthy.

And once broken, they too are discarded, and replaced by young and dynamic fresh blood.

When sports isn’t just something you consume on TV, but participate in, that’s the ideal that is sold: Sacrificing your health trying to make some millions, before being discarded once you break. 
Getting famous so you can turn around and push some products onto people who watch you.

Some old guy who is doing regular exercise via sports, and keeping in good physical shape until late in life? It’s not what maximizes profits.

When some exercise is done, then with the for-profit motive, that too becomes distorted.
There isn’t really much money to be made in telling someone that they can exercise topless, but selling them some fancy specialized sportswear, and all sorts of weird gadgets and machines and shakes and supplements and powders and so on, subscriptions to treadmills, that is more profitable than a walk in the park.

Instead of getting bike lanes, you end up taking the car to go pay a subscription to use an indoor bike, and a bunch of people trying to convince you that it will all be for nothing if you drink a glass of water without any added supplements.

It’s a whole for-profit industry, it’s not for public health.


You as an individual, when you make choices, maximizing your long term health outcomes, or minimizing your short term costs, are going to be at odds with each other almost all of the time.

For any company that has employees and customers, same thing, public health and short term gains in the next quarterly report are at odds.

For any government too, investing in infrastructure that improves long term mental and physical health outcomes is directly at odds with doing austerity politics, and/or trying to maximize tax revenue.

If people take the bike lane to the public park, and then do some exercise there… It means you pay basically nothing for that trip. There isn’t really any profit being made, or much money changing hands, buying the bike would be the biggest investment, but it’s not much.

But then some of the people drilling for oil are not needed anymore, profits drop there, the gas station is less profitable if you use the bike, the fitness industry is not getting a subscription from you, no tax is being paid there either, no profits, no employment. 
You can drink some water from a public fountain at the park, and again, if you are not drinking some soda, or gigantic coffee, or some exercise drink, or energy drink, or something like that, it’s entire industries that vanish, tax revenue that crumbles away as the addictions to sugar disappear.

If you are less sick and obese, then that’s again at odds with the healthcare industry, and the profits of the pharmaceutical companies.

If you are privileged enough to be in a place where you can still buy seasonal fruits and vegetables from some local market, and you do that, well that’s horrible for the junk food industry, and the fast food places, and the supermarkets and other retailers, and the shipping industry, and the factories who manufacture the high fructose treats, and so on.

Every addiction that you abandon is an industry that suffers, and a lost opportunity to profit.


Today, society is sick, and we, the people in it, are sick too.

Because the whole thing and almost all of our behaviors are oriented for selfish monetary profits, and not maximizing public health, meaning our own health.

Maximizing profits means that people always trend towards scams, selling addictions, subscriptions, ineffective band-aid solutions, and even creating problems, manufacturing needs, insecurities and so on.

We sell addictions and junk food and debt to each other, we all end up poor and sick, with only a couple of people sitting on big piles of money.

But if anyone suggests changing anything… Well, it threatens our jobs, our income sources! 
It threatens our lifestyles as isolated fattening people who are collecting addictions and subscriptions and chronic health issues of all kind. 
It threatens profits, passive incomes, tax revenue and power for politicians, it threatens the financial system, and the profits of every industry. 
It threatens the status quo.

Most people just don’t really want to envision a world where we do anything else than selling each other addictions, and creating problems so we can sell solutions and subscriptions, and where people are not constantly threatened by violence and expulsions and foreclosures and getting fired, and strained and pushed 40+ hours per week.

Everyone trumpets around about the value of “hard work”, as if having some time off and spending it with friends and family and taking care of your health was some kind of a crime, people are accused of the sin of laziness if they suggest we could all work less and be better off.

You must work hard to create addictions and sell junk, so that you can then afford to buy your own health problems, consuming as much stuff as possible, until it makes you sick, and leaves you broke, and/or broken.

It’s declared to be the one and only way of life, the very best use and distribution of resources, and making us all very wealthy.

Thursday, 9 July 2026

How does the concept of rent-seeking contribute to persistent poverty, and why is it so difficult to eliminate?

When people are sitting around collecting passive incomes, it’s very difficult to eliminate because the people getting the free money want to continue getting that free money. In fact, they usually want more and more free money.

The problem is that the free money isn’t really free.

When someone like Bill gates owns hundreds of thousands of acres of farm land, and rents out the farm land to receive a passive income…

Well, someone has to pay that passive income.

And it’s actually the farmer who works the land, who ends up paying rent for the land, paying the passive income of the wealthy rent seeking owner.

And then since the farmer needs to eat, he will increase the price of the stuff he sells. So you and me, and all of the average consumers, we are the ones who end up paying the passive incomes of the super wealthy, through things like increased grocery prices.


It’s difficult to eliminate because all of the wealthy people who get free money for being wealthy, want to keep receiving that free money. 
So they lie to themselves, and to everyone else, and pretend that it’s totally helping everyone else when they do it, or that it can’t possibly affect anyone negatively, or things like that.

Many people firmly believe in this type of neofeudalism, where landlords with inheritable titles sit around collecting money from the people who do the actual work.

They invent little stories, telling themselves that it’s actually vitally important to grant monopolies on insulin and other life saving drugs, so that the owners of pharmaceutical companies can get a big passive incomes, and have the right incentives to research how to extend the patents.

Or sometimes they will say things like “life’s unfair, let’s keep it that way because the unfairness benefits me”.


Point to some old homeless vet with no legs who is getting a couple hundred dollars, and all the wealthy people will be up in arms about the free money, demanding to know if the guy really deserves it or not, declaring it to be fraud, saying that it needs to be cut.

Same thing if some kid is getting a meal in school, or living off food stamps. 
Then, wealthy people are very very very concerned about who is getting free money, and how much. 
“Does the worker living out of his car 
really deserve healthcare”, they ask. 
“who’d gonna pay for it” and “I don’t want to pay for other people’s [insert whatever here]” also come up often.

But when it comes to the free money of the multibillionaires? 
Complete amnesia about how it all works, suddenly it’s just self-made free money appearing out of thin air!


Personally, I think I think that workers like me being taxed to provide a pension to old people so they can retire with some dignity and not be left to starve, is a good idea.

But the other rent seeking shit, where we are forced to fund the passive incomes and the wealth growth of multibillionaires flying in private jets from epstein islands to luxury palaces?

That’s where the welfare fraud really is.

Rentiers greedily sucking on the tit of passive income, squeezing everyone dry to try and get a couple more drops. 
Who’s gonna pay for their space tourism and luxury yachts? 
You and me, and everyone else. 
Same as usual.

Thursday, 2 July 2026

Today, society is sick, and we, the people in it, are sick too.

The issue is that what is best for public health, and what is most profitable, are often completely at odds with each other.

And then since almost our entire society is oriented around maximizing profits, with absolutely no regards for the negative impacts on public health…

Almost everyone ends up stressed out, tired, trying to manage chronic issues, anxiety, burnout, depression, addictions, obesity, and so on.

When the profit motives get involved, and doctors are in it for the money, and drug lobbyists are in it for the money, and pharmaceutical companies are run to maximize the profits of a few, and not the health of the many… 
Well then you end up with doctors overprescribing opioids, and enriching the Purdue family while a public health crisis is made even worse.

And it’s not just medicine that ends up sick and twisted in that way by the profit motive. 
The transportation industry pushes for a car centric society and not walkable cities and bike lanes. 
Pollution overall is quite profitable, plastic is cheap and competitive, so almost every company sells plastic stuff, and the public health issues with microplastic pollution being everywhere, including our blood, are kind of brushed aside.


Food is kind of important if you want to stay in good health. 
Fresh fruit and vegetables are good for your health, we know that.

But also, perishable fresh fruit are a nightmare for the food industry. It’s not just much harder to store fresh produce, and to deal with logistics, when you switch over to processed junk food, it’s also less satiating so you can sell more, people are willing to pay more, it’s more addictive, it makes more people come back, it’s less work, you can piggyback off the ads from the junk food companies and display their logos to lure people in, and so on.

Making a restaurant that sells some kind of fresh fruit and vegetables based stuff is overall very low profits. Replace the veggies with something like fries from the freezer and oil and salt that store a long time, and you can increase profits. Replace the fruit with sugary artificial fruit flavored ice cream from a big brand, advertise it with one of their signs, and you can increase profits. 
Push people to drink a cocktail, some alcohol, or a soda, instead of tap water, and again, profits increase while public health outcomes decrease. 
After the salty junk food, you can offer a dose of caffeine, and push people to eat a big dose of sugar, and again, that’s where the profits come from.

You could start off in the restaurant industry, full of hopes and dreams, imagining that you’ll make people slightly less sick than the rest of the junk food places. But when every other place is using all the tricks they can to maximize profits, and rents and costs are increasing, and many customers are more attracted by junk food than by veggies… Well, either you end up kicked out of the industry by market forces, or you end up broken, having to make concession after concession, inevitably driven towards being a provider of addictions, considering whether adding a tobacco machine might help drive traffic, wondering if you are allowed to install a one armed bandit, or sell some kind of gambling addiction or something, just trying to find some way to make ends meet.

When adding extra sugar and salt to everything increases revenue by a lot, then in a profit-maximizing economy, if you want to be part of the food industry, you end up forced to do it.

When there is a guy selling drugs, and another selling salad, the guy who is selling addictions can increase prices much more, and get repeat customers much more easily than the one selling salads. There is more money to be made cooking meth or making coffee and serving alcohol, than you can make from cooking a healthy vegetable soup.


What is the education budget spent on teaching people healthy eating habits, vs the budget spent on ads and marketing for junk food that makes people sick?

One is much less profitable than the other.

How is your job organized? 
It’s probably a for-profit corporation. 
So your breaks are kept to a minimum regardless of the impacts on your health, you might have to pee in bottles, or go through “crunch time”, and both your mental and physical health are likely going to be sacrificed at every opportunity in order to maximize profits. You’ll be treated as a human resources, to be strained to the maximum, and then discarded if broken. Schedules and deadlines will be set without regard to how much stress it causes you, just based on what is presumed to maximize profits. You might get something like free access to caffeine in order to boost your productivity, and you might get stuff like emails or phone calls during your free time, weekends, and holidays. 
Sometimes some efforts might be made to keep some people from burning out too quickly, but it’s a purely profit based thing, based on how much it would cost to train a replacement or automate the job. If a pizza party here and there helps cut down on turnover costs a bit, it can happen. 
But overall, straining people, and then discarding them and trying to replace them with someone fresh, young and dynamic if they ever stumble and can’t keep up, is just the normal way of doing business, of maximizing profits.


High inequality and poverty leads to more health issues, diseases, addictions, lower life expectancy and so on. 
It’s very well studied, if instead of ensuring that everyone can have a decent standard of living, you give all the money to a couple of wealthy people, and have everyone else live in poverty, public health declines.

But it’s also just the way that the profit motive distorts every industry.

Sports is supposed to be good for your health. Moving a bit, doing soe exercise, great idea, no?

But then you add in the profit motive… 
And then instead of sports being a kind of physical exercise that you do in order to remain healthy, it morphs into something that you watch on TV while sitting on a couch and consuming junk food, a way to sell you merch, and get you to drink more beer, something to gamble on, something that warps the entire college and education system, something where even the athletes who manage to resist doping themselves too much end up strained so hard that it becomes unhealthy.

And once broken, they too are discarded, and replaced by young and dynamic fresh blood.

When sports isn’t just something you consume on TV, but participate in, that’s the ideal that is sold: Sacrificing your health trying to make some millions, before being discarded once you break. 
Getting famous so you can turn around and push some products onto people who watch you.

Some old guy who is doing regular exercise via sports, and keeping in good physical shape until late in life? It’s not what maximizes profits.

When some exercise is done, then with the for-profit motive, that too becomes distorted.
There isn’t really much money to be made in telling someone that they can exercise topless, but selling them some fancy specialized sportswear, and all sorts of weird gadgets and machines and shakes and supplements and powders and so on, subscriptions to treadmills, that is more profitable than a walk in the park.

Instead of getting bike lanes, you end up taking the car to go pay a subscription to use an indoor bike, and a bunch of people trying to convince you that it will all be for nothing if you drink a glass of water without any added supplements.

It’s a whole for-profit industry, it’s not for public health.


You as an individual, when you make choices, maximizing your long term health outcomes, or minimizing your short term costs, are going to be at odds with each other almost all of the time.

For any company that has employees and customers, same thing, public health and short term gains in the next quarterly report are at odds.

For any government too, investing in infrastructure that improves long term mental and physical health outcomes is directly at odds with doing austerity politics, and/or trying to maximize tax revenue.

If people take the bike lane to the public park, and then do some exercise there… It means you pay basically nothing for that trip. There isn’t really any profit being made, or much money changing hands, buying the bike would be the biggest investment, but it’s not much.

But then some of the people drilling for oil are not needed anymore, profits drop there, the gas station is less profitable if you use the bike, the fitness industry is not getting a subscription from you, no tax is being paid there either, no profits, no employment. 
You can drink some water from a public fountain at the park, and again, if you are not drinking some soda, or gigantic coffee, or some exercise drink, or energy drink, or something like that, it’s entire industries that vanish, tax revenue that crumbles away as the addictions to sugar disappear.

If you are less sick and obese, then that’s again at odds with the healthcare industry, and the profits of the pharmaceutical companies.

If you are privileged enough to be in a place where you can still buy seasonal fruits and vegetables from some local market, and you do that, well that’s horrible for the junk food industry, and the fast food places, and the supermarkets and other retailers, and the shipping industry, and the factories who manufacture the high fructose treats, and so on.

Every addiction that you abandon is an industry that suffers, and a lost opportunity to profit.


Today, society is sick, and we, the people in it, are sick too.

Because the whole thing and almost all of our behaviors are oriented for selfish monetary profits, and not maximizing public health, meaning our own health.

Maximizing profits means that people always trend towards scams, selling addictions, subscriptions, ineffective band-aid solutions, and even creating problems, manufacturing needs, insecurities and so on.

We sell addictions and junk food and debt to each other, we all end up poor and sick, with only a couple of people sitting on big piles of money.

But if anyone suggests changing anything… Well, it threatens our jobs, our income sources! 
It threatens our lifestyles as isolated fattening people who are collecting addictions and subscriptions and chronic health issues of all kind. 
It threatens profits, passive incomes, tax revenue and power for politicians, it threatens the financial system, and the profits of every industry. 
It threatens the status quo.

Most people just don’t really want to envision a world where we do anything else than selling each other addictions, and creating problems so we can sell solutions and subscriptions, and where people are not constantly threatened by violence and expulsions and foreclosures and getting fired, and strained and pushed 40+ hours per week.

Everyone trumpets around about the value of “hard work”, as if having some time off and spending it with friends and family and taking care of your health was some kind of a crime, people are accused of the sin of laziness if they suggest we could all work less and be better off.

You must work hard to create addictions and sell junk, so that you can then afford to buy your own health problems, consuming as much stuff as possible, until it makes you sick, and leaves you broke, and/or broken.

It’s declared to be the one and only way of life, the very best use and distribution of resources, and making us all very wealthy.

In theory, we should be able to agree on a lot of things.

Take something like insulin.  If you give a for-profit corporation a monopoly on a life saving drug, they will jack up the prices to maximiz...